Mario Bautista defeats Cory Sandhagen by unanimous decision
Sandhagen vs Bautista — Bantamweight · UFC 329
What happened
The result, the defining moments, and what the verdict means.
Bautista targeted Sandhagen's lead leg and drove the fight into takedowns.
Sandhagen stayed competitive with straight punching in the striking exchanges.
Bautista's takedowns carried the unanimous decision.
- Secondary fallback play-by-play reportSherdog · UFC 329 play-by-play
Watch
More from this fight.
More videos · 8 clips
Signature moments
Signature moments
Who Called It?
How the analysts' picks held up once the cage door closed.
Analyst picks: Bedtime MMA perfect call; The MMA Guru perfect call; DFS By The Numbers perfect call; HopperoMMA perfect call; Half The Battle perfect call; AJ missed; Mike Finch missed; TheWeasle missed; Michael Bisping missed; Demetrious Johnson missed.
5 of 10 called the winner · 5 nailed the finish ★.
The experts above are a lens, not credentials we conferred — analyst, fighter or betting desk.
Full analyst picks ↓
Bedtime MMA Analyst called 67 of 99 Bedtime MMA: predicted Bautista · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Perfect call.
Gun to his head, sides with Bautista over Sandhagen. Bautista has improved significantly since their 2019 first meeting and his grappling and footwork evolution make him the more dangerous fighter now. Picks Bautista to outwork Sandhagen over three rounds and announce his title run.
“I'm going to go with Mario Bautista to win this one by decision.”
Track record: winner called in 67 of 99 resolved picks, 28 a perfect call.
The MMA Guru Analyst called 44 of 65 The MMA Guru: predicted Bautista · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Perfect call.
Thinks Bautista's physicality, cage pressure and wrestling optics are enough to win close rounds. He expects Sandhagen to be dangerous and creative, but not damaging enough to clearly outweigh Bautista's control and aggression on the judges' cards.
“I think this is too much to overcome.”
Track record: winner called in 44 of 65 resolved picks, 16 a perfect call.
DFS By The Numbers Betting deskAnalyst called 60 of 88 DFS By The Numbers: predicted Bautista · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Perfect call.
Calls it extremely close but sides with Bautista's wrestling, grappling and takedown threat. He likes Sandhagen's striking, yet thinks Bautista can bank enough control and blunt enough output to edge the cards.
Track record: winner called in 60 of 88 resolved picks, 23 a perfect call.
HopperoMMA Analyst called 41 of 65 HopperoMMA: predicted Bautista · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Perfect call.
Takes Mario Bautista as an underdog because he can threaten Cory Sandhagen in both striking and grappling phases. He thinks Sandhagen's elite schedule matters, but Bautista's all-around pressure gives Sandhagen more to solve than a one-discipline matchup.
Track record: winner called in 41 of 65 resolved picks, 15 a perfect call.
Half The Battle Analyst called 33 of 48 Half The Battle: predicted Bautista · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Perfect call. Note: Projects a close, split-decision-style fight.
Picks Mario Bautista to upset Cory Sandhagen in a close rematch. He expects a one-round-apiece type fight decided by a single takedown, strike or late moment, and favors Bautista's current form and hunger coming off his career-best win.
* Projects a close, split-decision-style fight.
Track record: winner called in 33 of 48 resolved picks, 7 a perfect call.
AJ Betting deskAnalyst called 52 of 71 AJ: predicted Sandhagen · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Miss.
Sees Sandhagen as a little craftier, faster and more dynamic than Bautista. He respects Bautista's volume and cardio, but thinks Sandhagen's range tools and grappling answers edge the rematch.
Track record: winner called in 52 of 71 resolved picks, 25 a perfect call.
Mike Finch Betting deskAnalyst called 23 of 36 Mike Finch: predicted Sandhagen · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Miss.
Says Bautista lacks the clear wrestling advantage needed to blunt Sandhagen. He trusts Sandhagen's schedule, submission grappling and ability to win two of three rounds in the big cage.
Track record: winner called in 23 of 36 resolved picks, 9 a perfect call.
TheWeasle Analyst called 34 of 48 TheWeasle: predicted Sandhagen · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Miss.
Sees a high-level rematch where Bautista will land and test whether Sandhagen's chin has slipped, but still trusts Sandhagen's range tools. He expects Sandhagen's long-range work and jab to edge a 29-28 unanimous decision.
Track record: winner called in 34 of 48 resolved picks, 14 a perfect call.
Michael Bisping AnalystFighter called 12 of 20 Michael Bisping: predicted Sandhagen · Decision. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Miss.
Calls it a tough matchup, but sides with Sandhagen's reach, range, footwork and fight IQ. He thinks Bautista is underappreciated and well-rounded, yet expects Sandhagen to solve enough of the puzzle to win a decision.
“I'm going with Cory Sandhagen for a decision victory.”
Track record: winner called in 12 of 20 resolved picks, 1 a perfect call.
Demetrious Johnson AnalystFighter called 9 of 15 Demetrious Johnson: predicted Sandhagen · to win. Actual Bautista · Dec. Result: Miss.
Calls the rematch close and gives Bautista real credit, but sides with Sandhagen's well-roundedness and elite schedule. He frames it as a near coin flip before choosing Sandhagen as the fighter who has fought and understood the highest-level problems.
“I'm going to have to go with Cory Sanhagen.”
Track record: winner called in 9 of 15 resolved picks.
We Want Picks Betting desk on the fence We Want Picks: made no pick. Didn't call it.
The desk split the rematch: Angelo picked Mario Bautista, citing the improved wrestling and overall game, while Jacob picked Cory Sandhagen by decision because he expects Sandhagen's activity and movement to win the striking minutes.
Archive Pre-fight material — kept for transparency.
- 4.86 5.30
- 56% 55%
- 3.47 3.98
- 56% 56%
- 61% 56%
- 18-6-0
- Record
- 17-3-0
- 3-2 last 5
- Recent formRecent formWin–loss record over the fighter’s last five bouts, newest first, as carried in their UFC/FightMetric career stats.
- 4-1 last 5
- Switch
- StanceStanceWhich side a fighter leads from — a striking term, not a religious one. Orthodox: right-handed, left foot and hand forward (the common default). Southpaw: the mirror image, right side forward (usually a left-hander). Switch: changes between the two during a fight.
- Switch
- 14:43
- Avg. fight timeAvg. timeAverage fight timeThe mean length of the fighter’s bouts (minutes:seconds) — a rough read on whether they tend to finish early or go the distance. From UFC/FightMetric.
- 10:06
- United States
- Nationality
- United States
- High Altitude Martial Arts · Aurora
- Team
- The MMA Lab · Arizona
Career stats per UFC.com; recent form is each fighter's last five bouts. Numbers reflect records coming into fight night. Bars compare each stat on a fixed scale; the “Edge” marker flags the leading corner where the gap is meaningful. The snapshot plots five career rates — output, striking defense, durability (strikes absorbed, inverted), takedown defense and finish rate — each normalised on its own scale.
Pre-fight analysis — how we saw it going in
Case for Sandhagen
Sandhagen is the more proven and more creative striker — rangy switch-stance kickboxing, a flying-knee highlight reel and two title-fight experiences. He out-classes most of the division on the feet and already owns a win over Bautista, a first-round submission in 2019. Class and length are on his side.
Case for Bautista
Bautista is the live underdog on a long win streak, with the grappling and pace to grind even elite names — he out-worked José Aldo and submitted Vinicius Oliveira in his first headliner. Seven years on from that debut loss, he is a far more complete fighter and will look to turn this into the wrestling-heavy scrap that has carried his cards.
What We Were Watching For
- Can Bautista close the distance and wrestle, or does Sandhagen's length keep it a kickboxing match?
- Does the 2019 first-round submission still mean anything seven years and two very different careers later?
- Sandhagen's takedown defence (56%) against Bautista's grinding top game.
- Both are coming off grappling-heavy decision losses to Umar Nurmagomedov — who adjusts better?












Comments are currently closed while we finish moderation and privacy controls.