UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues
Anthony Wint defeats Terrance Chatman by Submission
Round 1 · 4:29
Chatman vs Wint · UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues
At a glance
Analysts, AI and market side by side. Open a tab for the detail.
What happened
The result, the defining moments, and what the verdict means.
Chatman threatened a kimura early in the fight.
Wint escaped the submission attempt and worked to knee-on-belly.
In the final minute, Wint clamped onto an arm-triangle choke that ended the fight at 4:29 of round one.
- Official UFC resultsUFC Sacramento main card results
Pre-fight analysis — how we saw it going in
Case for Chatman
Chatman is 5-1 with four knockouts and three first-round finishes, and at 1.88 m he is the taller man by eight centimetres. His route is to use that frame before Wint gets inside it.
Case for Wint
Wint is 7-0 with five knockouts, one submission and four first-round finishes, carrying a 198 cm reach. He earned the booking by stopping Matt Adams via strikes at 0:34 of the first round on Dana White's Contender Series, Season 10 Episode 1.
What We Were Watching For
- Both men are debuting, so there is no UFC tape on either — every figure here is regional or Contender Series.
- Nine knockouts and seven first-round finishes between them across twelve wins; neither has often needed the judges.
- Wint's 198 cm reach against Chatman's eight-centimetre height advantage (1.88 m to 1.80 m).
- Wint is unbeaten at 7-0, and Chatman's single defeat is the only loss in the fight.
Records & career stats
- 5-1-0
- Record
- 7-0-0
- —
- Recent formRecent formWin–loss record over the fighter’s last five bouts, newest first, as carried in their UFC/FightMetric career stats.
- Source pending
- United States
- Nationality
- United States
- 29
- Age
- 30
- Not published
- Reach
- 198.12 cm
- —
- StanceStanceWhich side a fighter leads from — a striking term, not a religious one. Orthodox: right-handed, left foot and hand forward (the common default). Southpaw: the mirror image, right side forward (usually a left-hander). Switch: changes between the two during a fight.
- Not published
- —
- Finish rateFinish %Finish rateThe share of a fighter’s wins that ended inside the distance — by KO/TKO or submission — rather than going to the judges’ scorecards. Higher means more finishes.
- Source pending
- —
- Wins by KO/TKOKO wins
- —
- —
- Wins by submissionSub wins
- —
- Not published
- Sig. strikes landed / minStr / minSignificant strikes landed per minuteAverage number of significant strikes a fighter lands for every minute of fight time — a read on striking output and pace. From UFC/FightMetric career stats.
- 3.56
- —
- Sig. strikes absorbed / minAbs / minSignificant strikes absorbed per minuteAverage number of significant strikes a fighter takes for every minute of fight time. Lower is better — it means they get hit less often. From UFC/FightMetric career stats.
- Source pending
- —
- Striking defenseStrike def.Striking defenseThe percentage of opponents’ significant strikes that do not land — strikes slipped, blocked or evaded. Higher is better. Not the same as striking accuracy, which counts your own strikes that land. From UFC/FightMetric.
- Source pending
- —
- Takedown defenseTD def.Takedown defenseThe percentage of opponents’ takedown attempts that are stuffed. Higher means harder to put on the mat. From UFC/FightMetric.
- Source pending
- —
- Avg. fight timeAvg. timeAverage fight timeThe mean length of the fighter’s bouts (minutes:seconds) — a rough read on whether they tend to finish early or go the distance. From UFC/FightMetric.
- Source pending
Career stats per UFC.com; recent form is each fighter's last five bouts. Numbers reflect the fighter data snapshot used for this page. Bars compare each stat on a fixed scale; the “Edge” marker flags the leading corner where the gap is meaningful. The snapshot plots five career rates — output, striking defense, durability (strikes absorbed, inverted), takedown defense and finish rate — each normalised on its own scale.
Who Called It?
How the analysts' picks held up once the cage door closed.
- Winner Accuracy 68.8% 66 30
- Method Accuracy 42.6% 20 27
- Round Accuracy 26.9% 7 19
- Underdog Accuracy 41.2% 7 10
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
- Winner Accuracy 66.4% 77 39
- Method Accuracy 61.7% 29 18
- Round Accuracy 44.4% 4 5
- Underdog Accuracy 25.0% 2 6
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
- Winner Accuracy 64.1% 93 52
- Method Accuracy 40.0% 2 3
- Round AccuracyNamed rounds — none on a correct call yet
- Underdog Accuracy 34.5% 10 19
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
Analyst picks: MMA JOEY Hit; JakeGerberMMA Hit; We Want Picks Hit.
| Expand row | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMA JOEY
MMA JOEYView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Favourite call, market price 89.5%. Wint · KO/TKO · R1 | Wint · Sub R1 | Hit | Miss | Hit | |
| Picks Anthony Wint to win. “I'll say first round brutal KO win for Anthony Wint.” Track record: winner called in 66 of 96 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
JakeGerberMMA
JakeGerberMMAView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Favourite call, market price 89.5%. Wint · KO/TKO · R1 | Wint · Sub R1 | Hit | Miss | Hit | |
| Rates Chatman's boxing as solid and actually decent, then calls it a bad matchup: beating Wint requires surviving early danger to drag the fight long. Leans on Wint's athletic advantage -- which he ranks above much of the heavyweight division -- plus one-shot power, a good ground game and the takedown defence shown against Matt Adams on the Contender Series. Discloses he is a fan from Wint's FAU football days and is rooting for him. “Round one, knockout.” Track record: winner called in 77 of 116 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
We Want Picks
We Want PicksView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Favourite call, market price 89.5%. Wint · to win | Wint · Sub R1 | Hit | Not called | Not called | |
| Dismisses the short-turnaround worry -- Wint won on Tuesday's Contender Series in 34 seconds without absorbing a strike -- and takes the former NFL linebacker on power, speed and composure at heavyweight, with real takedowns behind it. Rates Chatman as a clean, well-trained technical striker with a UFC future, just not at heavyweight and not yet, because he is too hittable. “This fight was clearly set up for Anthony Wint to get a big win, and Anthony Wint will get a big win.” Track record: winner called in 93 of 145 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
3 of 3 nailed it.
The experts above are a lens, not credentials we conferred — analyst, fighter or betting desk.
AI Predictions — Results
Pre-fight calls compared with the recorded result. Winner, method and round are scored separately; market context names whether it comes from a qualified sportsbook snapshot or historic market reconstruction.
Actual Wint · Submission · R1
Closest probability ChatGPT put 62% on Wint.
AI Predictions — pre-fight snapshot
AI Predictions
Independent forecasts from ChatGPT and Gemini · latest 20 Aug, 2 days before the fight
Both models pick Wint
Both expect a win by KO/TKO, with win chances from 58% (Gemini) to 62% (ChatGPT).
Method mix differs most for KO/TKO: 70% (Gemini) to 75% (ChatGPT), a 5-point range.
-
ChatGPT
40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate
Pick Wint by KO/TKO in round 1
Win probability: Chatman 38%, Wint 62%.
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score. -
Gemini
45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
Pick Wint by KO/TKO in round 1
Win probability: Chatman 42%, Wint 58%.
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.
ChatGPT reads the fight as “Wint's unbeaten record and sequence of rapid first-round punch finishes suggest the sharper early finishing threat. Chatman's own knockout power and experience reaching later rounds keep the matchup competitive, but Wint is the more likely fighter to force an early exchange and capitalize.”
What to watch
- Wint has three consecutive first-round stoppages
- Chatman offers credible power and leg-kick offense
- The three-round format favors an aggressive early pace
Swing factor
Whether Chatman can disrupt Wint's opening surge and extend the fight beyond the first round.
More detail1 area differs
The models differ on probability distribution.
| Detail | ChatGPT | Gemini |
|---|---|---|
| How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack | ||
| Round | Round 1 | Round 1 |
| Detail | ChatGPT | Gemini |
|---|---|---|
| How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack | ||
| Round | Round 1 | Round 1 |
ChatGPT
Pick
Wint by KO/TKO in round 1
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.Winner probability by method
How ChatGPT sees the fight
Wint's unbeaten record and sequence of rapid first-round punch finishes suggest the sharper early finishing threat. Chatman's own knockout power and experience reaching later rounds keep the matchup competitive, but Wint is the more likely fighter to force an early exchange and capitalize.
Keys to victory
- Wint has three consecutive first-round stoppages
- Chatman offers credible power and leg-kick offense
- The three-round format favors an aggressive early pace
X-factor
Whether Chatman can disrupt Wint's opening surge and extend the fight beyond the first round.
GPT-5 · 20 Aug40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate
Gemini
Pick
Wint by KO/TKO in round 1
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.Winner probability by method
How Gemini sees the fight
Anthony Wint enters undefeated with notable early finishing power demonstrated across consecutive rapid first-round stoppage wins. Terrance Chatman brings valuable experience from extending into deeper rounds alongside diverse finishing tools, but Wint's immediate offensive pressure offers him a slight edge in an explosive heavyweight matchup likely decided in the opening exchanges.
Keys to victory
- Wint brings strong momentum with three consecutive first-round stoppage victories in under forty seconds.
- Chatman offers diverse finishing methods including punches and leg kicks, as well as past five-round experience.
- Heavyweight volatility and high early finishing tendencies suggest initial exchanges will carry significant weight.
X-factor
Whether Chatman can navigate Wint's initial first-minute flurry and extend the contest beyond the opening frame.
Gemini · 20 Aug45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
AI-generated · Not betting advice · 18+ (21+ where required) · Gambling help (opens in new tab) ↗
No market odds are available for this fight yet.
No videos are available for this fight yet.





Comments are currently closed while we finish moderation and privacy controls.