UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues  22 Aug 2026 · Golden 1 Center, Sacramento, California, US

Carli Judice defeats Jeisla Chaves by KO/TKO

KO/TKO · front kick to the body and punches

Round 1 · 1:39

Judice vs Chaves · UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues

At a glance

Analysts, AI and market side by side. Open a tab for the detail.

What happened

The result, the defining moments, and what the verdict means.

Judice stalked Chaves from the opening exchanges, cutting off her space.

She buried her toes into Chaves's midsection with a body kick that folded her over.

The kick ended the fight in an instant at 1:39 of round one.

Pre-fight analysis — how we saw it going in

Case for Judice

Judice lands 9.32 significant strikes per minute — the highest rate on this card — and five of her six wins are knockouts. Her route is a firefight finished inside the distance.

Case for Chaves

Chaves is 8-0 but finishes only half of those and averages the full 15:00. Her route is to absorb the opening exchanges and take the rounds on the scorecards.

What We Were Watching For

  • Judice's 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute against Chaves's 4.97 — close to double the volume.
  • Judice also concedes 6.62 per minute, and Chaves has not yet lost a fight.
  • Chaves averages the full 15:00 a bout to Judice's 11:38; whether this reaches a third round may settle it.
  • Chaves is 5-0 in her last five to Judice's 3-2, and Judice has never recorded a submission attempt (0.00 per 15 minutes).
Records & career stats
Judice Chaves
  1. OutputSig. strikes landed / min 9.33 5.02
  2. Striking def.Striking defense 58% 54%
  3. DurabilitySig. strikes absorbed / min 6.60 4.49
  4. Takedown def.Takedown defense 81% 63%
  5. FinishingFinish rate 83% 50%
6-2-0
Record
8-0-0
3-2 last 5
Recent formRecent formWin–loss record over the fighter’s last five bouts, newest first, as carried in their UFC/FightMetric career stats.
5-0 last 5
United States
Nationality
Brazil
27
Age
29
1.70 m
Height — Judice leads
1.68 m
173 cm
Reach
173 cm
—
StanceStanceWhich side a fighter leads from — a striking term, not a religious one. Orthodox: right-handed, left foot and hand forward (the common default). Southpaw: the mirror image, right side forward (usually a left-hander). Switch: changes between the two during a fight.
—
83%
Finish rateFinish % — Judice leadsFinish rateThe share of a fighter’s wins that ended inside the distance — by KO/TKO or submission — rather than going to the judges’ scorecards. Higher means more finishes.
50%
6
Wins by KO/TKOKO wins — Judice leads
4
0
Wins by submissionSub wins
0
9.33
Sig. strikes landed / minStr / min — Judice leadsSignificant strikes landed per minuteAverage number of significant strikes a fighter lands for every minute of fight time — a read on striking output and pace. From UFC/FightMetric career stats.
5.02
6.60
Sig. strikes absorbed / minAbs / min — Chaves leadsSignificant strikes absorbed per minuteAverage number of significant strikes a fighter takes for every minute of fight time. Lower is better — it means they get hit less often. From UFC/FightMetric career stats.
4.49
58%
Striking defenseStrike def. — Judice leadsStriking defenseThe percentage of opponents’ significant strikes that do not land — strikes slipped, blocked or evaded. Higher is better. Not the same as striking accuracy, which counts your own strikes that land. From UFC/FightMetric.
54%
81%
Takedown defenseTD def. — Judice leadsTakedown defenseThe percentage of opponents’ takedown attempts that are stuffed. Higher means harder to put on the mat. From UFC/FightMetric.
63%
09:58
Avg. fight timeAvg. timeAverage fight timeThe mean length of the fighter’s bouts (minutes:seconds) — a rough read on whether they tend to finish early or go the distance. From UFC/FightMetric.
10:33
Headkicks MMA
Team
Gomes Fight Team

Career stats per UFC.com; recent form is each fighter's last five bouts. Numbers reflect the fighter data snapshot used for this page. Bars compare each stat on a fixed scale; the “Edge” marker flags the leading corner where the gap is meaningful. The snapshot plots five career rates — output, striking defense, durability (strikes absorbed, inverted), takedown defense and finish rate — each normalised on its own scale.

Who Called It?

How the analysts' picks held up once the cage door closed.

Analyst picks: MMA JOEY Hit; JakeGerberMMA Hit; The MMA Guru Hit; We Want Picks Hit; Andrew Richardson Hit.

Analyst prediction scorecards
Expand row
MMA JOEY96 resolved calls
Historic market Favourite call, market price 83.5%. Judice · DecJudice · KO/TKO R1HitMissNot called
JakeGerberMMA116 resolved calls
Historic market Favourite call, market price 83.5%. Judice · KO/TKO · R2Judice · KO/TKO R1HitHitMiss
The MMA Guru296 resolved calls
Historic market Favourite call, market price 83.5%. Judice · DecJudice · KO/TKO R1HitMissNot called
We Want Picks145 resolved calls
Historic market Favourite call, market price 83.5%. Judice · to winJudice · KO/TKO R1HitNot calledNot called
Andrew Richardson52 resolved calls
Historic market Favourite call, market price 83.5%. Judice · KO/TKOJudice · KO/TKO R1HitHitNot called

5 of 5 nailed it.

The experts above are a lens, not credentials we conferred — analyst, fighter or betting desk.

AI Predictions — Results

Pre-fight calls compared with the recorded result. Winner, method and round are scored separately; market context names whether it comes from a qualified sportsbook snapshot or historic market reconstruction.

Actual Judice · KO/TKO · R1

Closest probability ChatGPT put 60% on Judice.

ChatGPT40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate
60% Judice
40% Chaves
PickJudice · KO/TKO · R2ActualJudice · KO/TKO · R1
WinnerHitMethodHitRoundMissHistoric market favouriteHistoric market favourite: FavouriteThe selected fighter had the higher market-implied chance of winning.Historic market favourite: favourite call
Claude41 of 64 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
55% Judice
45% Chaves
PickJudice · DecisionActualJudice · KO/TKO · R1
WinnerHitMethodMissRoundNot calledHistoric market favouriteHistoric market favourite: FavouriteThe selected fighter had the higher market-implied chance of winning.Historic market favourite: favourite call
Gemini45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
58% Judice
42% Chaves
PickJudice · DecisionActualJudice · KO/TKO · R1
WinnerHitMethodMissRoundNot calledHistoric market favouriteHistoric market favourite: FavouriteThe selected fighter had the higher market-implied chance of winning.Historic market favourite: favourite call
AI Predictions — pre-fight snapshot

AI Predictions

Independent forecasts from ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini · latest 20 Aug, 2 days before the fight

All 3 models pick Judice

They differ on how the fight ends, with win chances from 55% (Claude) to 60% (ChatGPT).

Method mix differs most for KO/TKO: 32% (Gemini) to 49% (ChatGPT), a 17-point range.

  • ChatGPT

    40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate

    Pick Judice by KO/TKO in round 2

    Win probability: Judice 60%, Chaves 40%.

    GPT-5 · 20 Aug

    Medium confidence
  • Claude

    41 of 64 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate

    Pick Judice by decision

    Win probability: Judice 55%, Chaves 45%.

    Claude · 20 Aug

    Low confidence
  • Gemini

    45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate

    Pick Judice by decision

    Win probability: Judice 58%, Chaves 42%.

    Gemini · 20 Aug

    Medium confidence

ChatGPT reads the fight as “Judice is the narrower pick in a striker-versus-striker matchup, with her varied recent finishing routes suggesting the stronger chance of creating a decisive opening. Chaves' unbeaten record and repeated success over three rounds keep the forecast competitive, but Judice may carry the greater finishing threat before the scorecards.”

What to watch

  • Judice offers multiple striking finish routes
  • Chaves has shown composure in close decisions
  • A three-round striking battle limits separation

Swing factor

Whether Chaves can manage distance and pace well enough to prevent Judice from building damaging combinations.

More detail4 areas differ

The models differ on finish method, round timing, confidence, probability distribution.

Forecast comparison by model
DetailChatGPTClaudeGemini
How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack
RoundRound 2——
Forecast comparison by model
DetailChatGPTClaudeGemini
How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack
RoundRound 2——

ChatGPT

Pick

Judice by KO/TKO in round 2

Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.
Win probability: Judice 60%, Chaves 40%

Winner probability by method

KO/TKO, 49% overall: Judice 36%, Chaves 13%
Submission, 5% overall: Judice 2%, Chaves 3%
Decision, 46% overall: Judice 22%, Chaves 24%

How ChatGPT sees the fight

Judice is the narrower pick in a striker-versus-striker matchup, with her varied recent finishing routes suggesting the stronger chance of creating a decisive opening. Chaves' unbeaten record and repeated success over three rounds keep the forecast competitive, but Judice may carry the greater finishing threat before the scorecards.

Keys to victory

  • Judice offers multiple striking finish routes
  • Chaves has shown composure in close decisions
  • A three-round striking battle limits separation

X-factor

Whether Chaves can manage distance and pace well enough to prevent Judice from building damaging combinations.

GPT-5 · 20 Aug40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate

Claude

Pick

Judice by decision

Low confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.
Win probability: Judice 55%, Chaves 45%

Winner probability by method

KO/TKO, 40% overall: Judice 22%, Chaves 18%
Submission, 5% overall: Judice 3%, Chaves 2%
Decision, 55% overall: Judice 30%, Chaves 25%

How Claude sees the fight

Two striker-forward flyweights meet in a matchup that could plausibly go either way. Judice has two recent striking stoppages and a decision win, while Chaves arrives unbeaten and has won her last two listed bouts by split decision. The supplied results support a competitive standup battle that could extend to the scorecards.

Keys to victory

  • Judice has recent finishes via strikes (TKO in two of her last three), suggesting she can end things early if she finds range
  • Chaves is unbeaten but her two most recent wins were split decisions, which may indicate closer, harder-to-score exchanges rather than dominant performances
  • Judice stopped Yuneisy Duben while Chaves later earned a split decision over the same opponent

X-factor

Whether Chaves can limit the striking openings that produced Judice's two recent stoppage wins.

Claude · 20 Aug41 of 64 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate

Gemini

Pick

Judice by decision

Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.
Win probability: Judice 58%, Chaves 42%

Winner probability by method

KO/TKO, 32% overall: Judice 22%, Chaves 10%
Submission, 8% overall: Judice 4%, Chaves 4%
Decision, 60% overall: Judice 32%, Chaves 28%

How Gemini sees the fight

This flyweight matchup features two listed strikers in Carli Judice and the undefeated Jeisla Chaves. Judice has two recent striking stoppages and a decision win, while Chaves' last two listed bouts ended in split-decision wins. Their common result against Yuneisy Duben gives Judice the clearer finishing evidence, though Chaves' unbeaten record keeps the forecast close.

Keys to victory

  • Demonstrated finishing power, where Judice has shown multiple stoppage pathways via strikes.
  • Chaves' two recent split-decision wins.
  • Comparative outcomes against common competition, with Judice previously earning an early stoppage while Chaves fought to a split verdict.

X-factor

Adaptability to the flyweight division for two competitors primarily designated in the strawweight ranks.

Gemini · 20 Aug45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate

AI-generated · Not betting advice · 18+ (21+ where required) · Gambling help (opens in new tab) ↗

No market odds are available for this fight yet.

No videos are available for this fight yet.

Comments

Comments are currently closed while we finish moderation and privacy controls.