55%
Padilla
45%
Haqparast
PickPadilla · DecisionActualPadilla · Submission · R3
WinnerHitMethodMissRoundNot calledUFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues
Chris Padilla defeats Nasrat Haqparast by Submission
Submission · arm-triangle choke
Round 3 · 4:59
Padilla vs Haqparast · UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues
At a glance
Analysts, AI and market side by side. Open a tab for the detail.
Analyst Picks3 analysts✓ Correct
100%3 picks
0%0 picks
AI PredictionAverage of 2 models: ChatGPT, Gemini✓ Correct
54%
46%
What happened
The result, the defining moments, and what the verdict means.
Padilla and Haqparast traded in a competitive, back-and-forth fight across the first two rounds.
Padilla dropped Haqparast in round three and immediately hunted for a finish.
With 30 seconds left, Padilla clamped an arm-triangle choke and referee Frank Trigg stopped the fight in the final second at 4:59.
- Official UFC preliminary resultsUFC Sacramento preliminary results
Pre-fight analysis — how we saw it going in
Case for Padilla
Padilla lands 6.19 significant strikes a minute and absorbs 4.88, a narrower margin than his opponent carries. His route is to keep the exchanges honest and make Haqparast pay for the volume he throws.
Case for Haqparast
Haqparast throws slightly more, at 6.36 landed per minute, and defends far better at 63% against 49%. His route is to win the pure striking contest on defence and let Padilla wear the difference.
What We Were Watching For
- The defensive gap: 63% striking defence against 49% is the widest split in either fighter’s tape.
- Haqparast absorbs 6.00 significant strikes a minute against Padilla’s 4.88 — he takes more even while defending better, which points to a high-traffic fight.
- Neither man wrestles: 0.34 and 1.13 takedowns per 15 minutes, so a grappling exchange would be out of character for both.
- Both carry high takedown defence (86% and 80%), so a late shot to steal a round is unlikely to land.
Records & career stats
- 17-6-1
- Record
- 18-6-0
- 4-0-1 last 5
- Recent formRecent formWin–loss record over the fighter’s last five bouts, newest first, as carried in their UFC/FightMetric career stats.
- —
- United States
- Nationality
- Morocco
- 30
- Age
- 30
- Orthodox
- StanceStanceWhich side a fighter leads from — a striking term, not a religious one. Orthodox: right-handed, left foot and hand forward (the common default). Southpaw: the mirror image, right side forward (usually a left-hander). Switch: changes between the two during a fight.
- —
- 82%
- Finish rateFinish %Finish rateThe share of a fighter’s wins that ended inside the distance — by KO/TKO or submission — rather than going to the judges’ scorecards. Higher means more finishes.
- —
- 9
- Wins by KO/TKOKO wins
- —
- 6
- Wins by submissionSub wins
- —
- 11:23
- Avg. fight timeAvg. timeAverage fight timeThe mean length of the fighter’s bouts (minutes:seconds) — a rough read on whether they tend to finish early or go the distance. From UFC/FightMetric.
- 11:56
Career stats per UFC.com; recent form is each fighter's last five bouts. Numbers reflect the fighter data snapshot used for this page. Bars compare each stat on a fixed scale; the “Edge” marker flags the leading corner where the gap is meaningful. The snapshot plots five career rates — output, striking defense, durability (strikes absorbed, inverted), takedown defense and finish rate — each normalised on its own scale.
Who Called It?
How the analysts' picks held up once the cage door closed.
(3) 100%
WPadilla
0% (0)
HaqparastL
MMA JOEYView full track record
- Winner Accuracy 68.8% 66 30
- Method Accuracy 42.6% 20 27
- Round Accuracy 26.9% 7 19
- Underdog Accuracy 41.2% 7 10
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
JakeGerberMMAView full track record
- Winner Accuracy 66.4% 77 39
- Method Accuracy 61.7% 29 18
- Round Accuracy 44.4% 4 5
- Underdog Accuracy 25.0% 2 6
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
We Want PicksView full track record
- Winner Accuracy 64.1% 93 52
- Method Accuracy 40.0% 2 3
- Round AccuracyNamed rounds — none on a correct call yet
- Underdog Accuracy 34.5% 10 19
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
Analyst picks: MMA JOEY Hit; JakeGerberMMA Hit; We Want Picks Hit.
| Expand row | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMA JOEY
MMA JOEYView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Padilla · Dec | Padilla · Sub R3 | Hit | Miss | Not called | |
| Picks Chris Padilla to win. “I'll say decision win.” Track record: winner called in 66 of 96 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
JakeGerberMMA
JakeGerberMMAView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Padilla · Dec | Padilla · Sub R3 | Hit | Miss | Not called | |
| Reads it as competitive and credits Haqparast's movement and high guard, suggesting he would be wise to work the body. Leans Padilla on forward pressure, with elbows and knees the deciding weapons -- expecting accumulated damage to edge it on the cards. Notes he has repeatedly backed Padilla as an underdog. “So slight lean for me towards Taco Padilla.” Track record: winner called in 77 of 116 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
We Want Picks
We Want PicksView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Padilla · to win | Padilla · Sub R3 | Hit | Not called | Not called | |
| Concedes Haqparast is the better and more technical striker with excellent takedown defence, then picks against him on durability and forward pressure, plus the risk he returns from a bad knockout loss hesitant to engage or on a strange game plan. Notes Haqparast has also underperformed against low-level opposition, and that the current odds are about where they should be. “So, Chris Padilla is going to be the pick.” Track record: winner called in 93 of 145 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
3 of 3 nailed it.
The experts above are a lens, not credentials we conferred — analyst, fighter or betting desk.
AI Predictions — Results
Pre-fight calls compared with the recorded result. Winner, method and round are scored separately; market context names whether it comes from a qualified sportsbook snapshot or historic market reconstruction.
Actual Padilla · Submission · R3
Closest probability ChatGPT put 55% on Padilla.
53%
Padilla
47%
Haqparast
PickPadilla · DecisionActualPadilla · Submission · R3
WinnerHitMethodMissRoundNot calledAI Predictions — pre-fight snapshot
AI Predictions
Independent forecasts from ChatGPT and Gemini · latest 20 Aug, 2 days before the fight
Both models pick Padilla
Both expect a win by decision, with win chances from 53% (Gemini) to 55% (ChatGPT).
Method mix differs most for KO/TKO: 28% (Gemini) to 32% (ChatGPT), a 4-point range.
-
ChatGPT
40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate
Pick Padilla by decision
Win probability: Padilla 55%, Haqparast 45%.
Low confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score. -
Gemini
45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
Pick Padilla by decision
Win probability: Padilla 53%, Haqparast 47%.
Low confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.
ChatGPT reads the fight as “Padilla is a narrow pick in a competitive lightweight matchup. His recent TKO win suggests a meaningful finishing threat, but both fighters have frequently reached close decisions, making a three-round verdict the likeliest outcome. Haqparast's experience in tightly contested bouts keeps the forecast near even.”
What to watch
- Padilla carries credible recent finishing upside
- Both fighters have produced close three-round results
- Haqparast's decision experience narrows the matchup
Swing factor
Whether Padilla can apply sustained pressure without giving Haqparast enough clean countering opportunities to control the scorecards.
More detail1 area differs
The models differ on probability distribution.
| Detail | ChatGPT | Gemini |
|---|---|---|
| How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack | ||
| Round | — | — |
| Detail | ChatGPT | Gemini |
|---|---|---|
| How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack | ||
| Round | — | — |
ChatGPT
Pick
Padilla by decision
Low confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.Win probability: Padilla 55%, Haqparast 45%
Winner probability by method
KO/TKO, 32% overall: Padilla 18%, Haqparast 14%
Submission, 8% overall: Padilla 5%, Haqparast 3%
Decision, 60% overall: Padilla 32%, Haqparast 28%
How ChatGPT sees the fight
Padilla is a narrow pick in a competitive lightweight matchup. His recent TKO win suggests a meaningful finishing threat, but both fighters have frequently reached close decisions, making a three-round verdict the likeliest outcome. Haqparast's experience in tightly contested bouts keeps the forecast near even.
Keys to victory
- Padilla carries credible recent finishing upside
- Both fighters have produced close three-round results
- Haqparast's decision experience narrows the matchup
X-factor
Whether Padilla can apply sustained pressure without giving Haqparast enough clean countering opportunities to control the scorecards.
GPT-5 · 20 Aug40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate
Gemini
Pick
Padilla by decision
Low confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.Win probability: Padilla 53%, Haqparast 47%
Winner probability by method
KO/TKO, 28% overall: Padilla 16%, Haqparast 12%
Submission, 12% overall: Padilla 7%, Haqparast 5%
Decision, 60% overall: Padilla 30%, Haqparast 30%
How Gemini sees the fight
Chris Padilla and Nasrat Haqparast meet in a lightweight bout featuring two experienced fighters known for competitive, closely contested matchups. Padilla enters having secured a stoppage win against Ismael Bonfim alongside split-decision and majority-draw results, whereas Haqparast looks to rebound from a recent first-round knockout loss following back-to-back split-decision victories. In a matchup where distance striking and pace are expected to dictate the terms, Padilla holds a slight edge in recent momentum over the course of three rounds.
Keys to victory
- Both competitors have recent histories of tight contests resulting in split decisions or draws.
- Padilla has demonstrated recent finishing capability with a second-round stoppage over Ismael Bonfim.
- Haqparast must re-establish defensive discipline following a first-round stoppage defeat in his last outing.
X-factor
Haqparast's ability to maintain high defensive output over three rounds against Padilla's forward momentum.
Gemini · 20 Aug45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
AI-generated · Not betting advice · 18+ (21+ where required) · Gambling help (opens in new tab) ↗
No market odds are available for this fight yet.
No videos are available for this fight yet.
Comments are currently closed while we finish moderation and privacy controls.