UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues
Vitor Petrino defeats Serghei Spivac by unanimous decision
Round 3 · 5:00
Spivac vs Petrino · UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues
At a glance
Analysts, AI and market side by side. Open a tab for the detail.
What happened
The result, the defining moments, and what the verdict means.
The heavyweights traded on the feet early, with Petrino's power giving him the edge in the exchanges.
Petrino took Spivac down in rounds two and three, forcing him to carry his weight on the mat.
Petrino chipped away with short shots while both exhausted heavyweights had little left to offer down the stretch.
- Official UFC resultsUFC Sacramento main card results
Pre-fight analysis — how we saw it going in
Case for Spivac
Spivac is the one heavyweight here who wrestles with intent — 3.82 takedowns per 15 minutes, second only to Hernandez on this card — and 8 of his 18 wins are submissions. His route is underneath Petrino early rather than trading.
Case for Petrino
Petrino holds 79% takedown defence and absorbs 2.71 significant strikes per minute to Spivac's 4.23. His route is to stay vertical and win the striking exchange he is already ahead in.
What We Were Watching For
- Spivac's 3.82 takedowns per 15 minutes against Petrino's 79% takedown defence.
- Spivac absorbs more than he lands (4.23 against 3.57 per minute); Petrino does the reverse (2.71 against 3.24).
- Spivac has lost three of his last five; Petrino has won three of his.
- Neither tends to need the full fifteen — 83% and 71% finish rates, with Spivac averaging 08:22 a bout.
Records & career stats
- 3.35 3.37
- 51% 53%
- 4.23 2.56
- 53% 81%
- 83% 71%
- 18-6-0
- Record
- 14-2-0
- 2-3 last 5
- Recent formRecent formWin–loss record over the fighter’s last five bouts, newest first, as carried in their UFC/FightMetric career stats.
- 3-2 last 5
- Moldova
- Nationality
- Brazil
- 31
- Age
- 28
- Orthodox
- StanceStanceWhich side a fighter leads from — a striking term, not a religious one. Orthodox: right-handed, left foot and hand forward (the common default). Southpaw: the mirror image, right side forward (usually a left-hander). Switch: changes between the two during a fight.
- —
- 08:47
- Avg. fight timeAvg. timeAverage fight timeThe mean length of the fighter’s bouts (minutes:seconds) — a rough read on whether they tend to finish early or go the distance. From UFC/FightMetric.
- 10:48
- Polar Bear Team
- Team
- CM System
Career stats per UFC.com; recent form is each fighter's last five bouts. Numbers reflect the fighter data snapshot used for this page. Bars compare each stat on a fixed scale; the “Edge” marker flags the leading corner where the gap is meaningful. The snapshot plots five career rates — output, striking defense, durability (strikes absorbed, inverted), takedown defense and finish rate — each normalised on its own scale.
Who Called It?
How the analysts' picks held up once the cage door closed.
- Winner Accuracy 66.4% 77 39
- Method Accuracy 61.7% 29 18
- Round Accuracy 44.4% 4 5
- Underdog Accuracy 25.0% 2 6
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
- Winner Accuracy 64.1% 93 52
- Method Accuracy 40.0% 2 3
- Round AccuracyNamed rounds — none on a correct call yet
- Underdog Accuracy 34.5% 10 19
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
- Winner Accuracy 57.7% 30 22
- Method Accuracy 70.0% 21 9
- Round AccuracyCalls the winner, not the round
- Underdog Accuracy 0.0% 5
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
- Winner Accuracy 68.8% 66 30
- Method Accuracy 42.6% 20 27
- Round Accuracy 26.9% 7 19
- Underdog Accuracy 41.2% 7 10
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
- Winner Accuracy 49.1% 26 27
- Method Accuracy 57.7% 15 11
- Round AccuracyCalls the winner, not the round
- Underdog Accuracy 27.8% 5 13
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls
Analyst picks: MMA JOEY Hit; JakeGerberMMA Miss; We Want Picks Miss; Andrew Richardson Miss; Jesse Holland Hit.
| Expand row | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMA JOEY
MMA JOEYView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Favourite call, market price 58.5%. Petrino · KO/TKO · R2 | Petrino · Dec R3 | Hit | Miss | Miss | |
| Picks Vitor Petrino to win. “I'll pick Petrino to get him out of there. I'll say late second round TKO for Vitor Petrino.” Track record: winner called in 66 of 96 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
JakeGerberMMA
JakeGerberMMAView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Underdog call, market price 41.5%. Spivac · to win | Petrino · Dec R3 | Miss | Not applicable — the winner call missed | Not applicable — the winner call missed | |
| Takes Spivac as the underdog, rating him a well-rounded heavyweight with sharp striking and calling the jab money against Delija. Expects him to outscore Petrino with the jab, right hand and leg kicks provided he avoids a big shot, and notes Petrino is very hittable. Adds that Spivac has the grappling fallback Petrino lacks if the striking goes badly. “Give me Sergey here.” Track record: winner called in 77 of 116 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
We Want Picks
We Want PicksView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Underdog call, market price 41.5%. Spivac · to win | Petrino · Dec R3 | Miss | Not applicable — the winner call missed | Not applicable — the winner call missed | |
| Takes Spivac as an underdog on grit and heavyweight experience: reads Petrino as an athlete who became a fighter rather than a fighter, and expects Spivac -- ten times the grappler of Petrino's last opponent -- to work in his own takedowns. Flags the one real concern that at heavyweight raw athleticism alone can still win a fight or two. “So, Sergey Spivak is going to be the pick.” Track record: winner called in 93 of 145 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
Andrew Richardson
Andrew RichardsonView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Underdog call, market price 41.5%. Spivac · Dec | Petrino · Dec R3 | Miss | Not applicable — the winner call missed | Not applicable — the winner call missed | |
| MMA Mania's UFC Sacramento X-Factor preview has Andrew Richardson picking Serghei Spivac by decision. Track record: winner called in 30 of 52 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
Jesse Holland
Jesse HollandView full track record
How each is counted: Winner called Method called Round called Correct underdog calls | Historic market Favourite call, market price 58.5%. Petrino · KO/TKO | Petrino · Dec R3 | Hit | Miss | Not called | |
| MMA Mania's UFC Sacramento preview has Jesse Holland picking Vitor Petrino by technical knockout. Track record: winner called in 26 of 53 resolved picks. How winner calls are counted | ||||||
2 of 5 called the winner.
The experts above are a lens, not credentials we conferred — analyst, fighter or betting desk.
AI Predictions — Results
Pre-fight calls compared with the recorded result. Winner, method and round are scored separately; market context names whether it comes from a qualified sportsbook snapshot or historic market reconstruction.
Actual Petrino · Decision · R3
Closest probability ChatGPT put 58% on Petrino.
AI Predictions — pre-fight snapshot
AI Predictions
Independent forecasts from ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini · latest 20 Aug, 2 days before the fight
All 3 models pick Petrino
They differ on how the fight ends, with win chances from 55% (Claude and Gemini) to 58% (ChatGPT).
Method mix differs most for KO/TKO: 32% (ChatGPT) to 45% (Gemini), a 13-point range.
-
ChatGPT
40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate
Pick Petrino by decision
Win probability: Spivac 42%, Petrino 58%.
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score. -
Claude
41 of 64 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
Pick Petrino by decision
Win probability: Spivac 45%, Petrino 55%.
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score. -
Gemini
45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
Pick Petrino by KO/TKO in round 2
Win probability: Spivac 45%, Petrino 55%.
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.
ChatGPT reads the fight as “Petrino’s varied three-fight winning run and striking profile give him a slight edge in a competitive heavyweight matchup. Spivac’s sambo remains a meaningful control and submission threat, but Petrino may do enough damage and sustained work to earn a decision if he manages the grappling exchanges.”
What to watch
- Petrino enters with three varied wins
- Spivac presents the stronger submission route
- Three-round format slightly favors measured consistency
Swing factor
Whether Spivac can repeatedly turn striking exchanges into sustained top control.
More detail3 areas differ
The models differ on finish method, round timing, probability distribution.
| Detail | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|
| How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack | |||
| Round | — | — | Round 2 |
| Detail | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|
| How it endsKO/TKOSubmissionDecisionTop to bottom in each stack | |||
| Round | — | — | Round 2 |
ChatGPT
Pick
Petrino by decision
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.Winner probability by method
How ChatGPT sees the fight
Petrino’s varied three-fight winning run and striking profile give him a slight edge in a competitive heavyweight matchup. Spivac’s sambo remains a meaningful control and submission threat, but Petrino may do enough damage and sustained work to earn a decision if he manages the grappling exchanges.
Keys to victory
- Petrino enters with three varied wins
- Spivac presents the stronger submission route
- Three-round format slightly favors measured consistency
X-factor
Whether Spivac can repeatedly turn striking exchanges into sustained top control.
GPT-5 · 20 Aug40 of 70 winner picks correct · 57% hit rate
Claude
Pick
Petrino by decision
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.Winner probability by method
How Claude sees the fight
Petrino enters on a three-fight win streak that includes a decision, a knockout, and a submission. Spivac's listed sambo style provides a contrasting route, while his recent results include a decision win, a decision loss, and a first-round TKO loss. Petrino's varied recent wins give him the slight edge in a competitive three-round matchup.
Keys to victory
- Petrino's recent results include decision, knockout, and submission wins
- Spivac's listed sambo style provides an alternative route
- Spivac's recent results include a first-round TKO loss
X-factor
How quickly Spivac can initiate clinch and takedown exchanges may determine whether this becomes a grinding control fight rather than a striking contest favoring Petrino.
Claude · 20 Aug41 of 64 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
Gemini
Pick
Petrino by KO/TKO in round 2
Medium confidenceConfidence labelBased on the higher win probability: Low below 58%, Medium 58–69%, High 70% or more. This is a coarse probability band, not a separate calibrated score.Winner probability by method
How Gemini sees the fight
This heavyweight contest features a stylistic clash between Serghei Spivac's listed sambo style and Vitor Petrino's listed striking style. Petrino enters after decision, knockout, and submission wins, while Spivac's recent results include two decisions and a TKO loss. Petrino's varied winning run gives him the narrow edge and a plausible stoppage route.
Keys to victory
- Petrino's listed striking style against Spivac's listed sambo style
- Petrino's recent decision, knockout, and submission wins
- Spivac's recent decision results and TKO loss
X-factor
Whether Spivac's sambo route can disrupt Petrino's varied recent winning form
Gemini · 20 Aug45 of 70 winner picks correct · 64% hit rate
AI-generated · Not betting advice · 18+ (21+ where required) · Gambling help (opens in new tab) ↗
No market odds are available for this fight yet.
No videos are available for this fight yet.





Comments are currently closed while we finish moderation and privacy controls.